domingo, 16 de febrero de 2014

Leadership Style



For the following essay, there is a selected leader. This leader can be a real life character or a fictional character from television, movies, or a book. Using leadership theories, we will analyze the selected character to identify its characteristics and provide specific examples of the qualities that we think this person possess that make him admirable.
Also the personal leadership style will be evaluated, identifying their own leadership characteristics, explaining our style of leadership, ideas and plans to improve our effectiveness as a leader based on a comparative contrast with the selected leader.
Selected Leader: Salvador Allende Parsi, Chile's first president to be elected democratically
Characteristics and examples of the qualities that made him a leader
There are countless stories that took place in commemoration of its pass away 40 years ago. In many of them, the contrast is total between moral smallness Pinochet and Allende 's historic debates, to tie biographies and trajectories . But in almost all repeats a strange and mysterious word "charisma", in this case associated with Allende.
What do we mean, and transmit with this word? What can we exactly mean this word when we speak of Allende as someone who was truly "charismatic"? The sociology wants, and thinks he sees in the exceptional attributes of charisma remarkable on men and women, such as courage, wisdom, heroism or beauty. Well, charisma is something else.
It is important to emphasize that charisma is not, as the occasion of the commemoration of the coup, but also of the presidential campaign, there are many who talk very seriously about the charisma of Allende.  If everyone have charisma and own it, then nothing is, then we are forced to face with an uncontrolled use of the notion.
Contrary to all appearances, charisma is not an innate attribute fact: not because someone can speak well and move you to tears, or did others noted for their courage or beauty that can be spoken of as charismatic leaders. In other words, charisma is not an essence or a nature that only a few can claim. It is for this reason that it is possible to say that Pinochet could benefit from beliefs of many Chileans (amnesic today) on the providential nature of his performance: speak well or not because it was beautiful, but because his actions today took place in a time of crisis and made sense.
At some point, there is something wrong stated in the phrase "the charisma of Allende", as it evokes the idea of something that is uniquely possessed, and that would be precisely what makes extraordinary the person who claims it. Why is it possible to speak of the "charisma" of Allende? Not because Salvador Allende, the citizen, had natural gifts as an orator and leader. He had both attributes, but that is not the most important. What constitutes its greatness and that gave rise to myths and legends (starting by the way as he would have died , committed suicide to many, killed for others…) , is his performance on a critical day . While Allende’s charisma originates in the experimental context of a revolutionary form of socialism by legal means, which nourishes him is his long political career (with the image of his famous " doll " and praised bargaining), the depth of the process of change that he urged the opposition and harsh reaction that popular legitimacy that surrounded him and can be seen displayed in some documentaries (Joignant, 2013). In this regard, the charisma of Allende has little or nothing to do with his personal attributes, since it refers primarily to a time when life converges learns a politician (with all its contradictions and successes), the critical nature of a date and a revolutionary process that inflamed the imagination of many.
Own leadership characteristics, contrast with the selected leader and ideas to improve our leadership abilities
Are the events, and the facts, the phenomena which produce extraordinary role of a "charismatic" leadership. Therefore, the charisma has nothing to do with empathy, with the connection that a person can have with a group or community. These qualities are necessary, but not sufficient. It requires much more. The Charisma in any case, has to do with the security that inspires the person and therefore it is generating trust (Mercedes, 2011).
I consider myself a charismatic leader for my actions and my decisions. I attract my co-workers and I become a motivator that convinces and moves with my tone of voice, and body language as a capacity. Also, the need to promote a vision and a dream for my company or organization at all times. Challenge, expectation, reality and realization, are the main characteristics of my type of leadership. Therefore, it is a change agent that synthesizes the stairs of the challenge, for better or worse, in a society at a given time (Mercedes, 2011).
For Stephen Robbins, the charismatic leadership theory is an “heroic attribution or extraordinary skill to leadership when followers observe certain behaviors." Produces charismatic leaders, and organization societies in difficult times, when they are faced with enormous challenges to their survival.  If we look over the past 40 years (Kennedy , Salvador Allende , Fidel Castro , Nelson Mandela , Bosch, Balaguer , Peña Gomez) mankind has produced charismatic leaders , however , no doubt that given the global social crisis that we have today, is sheltered on the horizon the emergence of this extraordinary leadership, that beyond the subjectivity in its conceptualization, is the one that takes the difficult moments of history in every society (Mercedes , 2011) .
What we want to emphasize is that charismatic leadership brings with it a momentous event and how that human being was assumed for the story, a fact which marks the person and the country where it occurs.
That charismatic leadership is given by the transcendental challenge of a society or an organization at a particular time. Beyond the personal qualities I have, is the severity of a given situation or a deep insight regarding society, equality or fighting for the rights of humanity.
To learn Charisma means learning to attract others with my body language, attire as by my words, and tone of voice, is the set of myself and improve my charisma to the maximum means the maximum improve of me.
Once a person combines charisma with leadership then they gets unstoppable charismatic leadership to lead and ultimately make the persons follow him.
Leadership is an art and choosing a leader or not, not only chose it for its leadership, but largely by his charisma. Therefore it is very important to have leadership and charisma, because charisma which greatly facilitates follows you and respect your decisions and leadership still makes you know the right direction and indicate how. Both tools are extremely effective and charismatic leader leadership literally “eat with potatoes” any other leader.

References

Cielinska, K. (2007). The Basic Roles of a Manager in Business Organization. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 6:3-12.
Joignant, A.  (2013). Allende’s Charisma.  Retrieved on October 23, 2013.  Retrieved from
Mercedes, C. (2011). Deshojando Paradigmas, La Subjetividad del Liderazgo Carismático, 
Retrieved on October 22, 2013.  Retrieved from http://www.acento.com.do/index.php/blog/1352
/78/La-subjetividad-del-liderazgo-carismatico.html
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior. New York, NY: Pearson Education.
 

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario